|
告美國政府之訴訟案  建國黨告美國政府 United States District Court, Washington D.C. 美國首都華府，聯邦法院 filed: Oct. 24, 2006 2006年10月24日遞狀  Summary of the Complaint for Declaratory Relief 本訴訟案之摘要如下： (1) The Republic of China was entrusted with authority over Formosa and the Pescadores as agent for the Allied Powers. This arrangement was specified in General Order No. 1 of Sept. 2, 1945. Such trust on behalf of the Allied Powers remains in effect today. Nothing in the post-war San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT) nor in any other treaty ever executed by or between the Republic of China (ROC) and the other Allied Powers has altered this trusteeship arrangement. (See pages 2 to 3) 中華民國對管理台灣之身分僅係代表同盟國。這樣的安排記錄在 1945年9月2日 的一般命令第一號。這個代表同盟國來管理台灣的關係到今天仍然存在。無論是戰後的舊金山和平條約或其餘中華民國與其他同盟國任何條約，對於這樣的關係絲毫沒有改變。 (2) Defendant United States of America is and remains the "principal occupying Power" of Taiwan under SFPT Article 23(a). (See page 4) 依據舊金山和平條約第 23 條 a 項，被告美國政府一直是台灣的「主要佔領權國」。 (3) By way of historical background, following the 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki, Japan exercised sovereignty over Taiwan and held title to its territory. (See page 6) 台灣之相關歷史背景是：依據馬關條約，日本自 1895 年起，對台灣行使主權並擁有台灣的領土所有權。 (4) The United States entered the Pacific War against Japan on Dec. 8, 1941. The Allied Powers defeated Japan, and it surrendered on Sept. 2, 1945. (See page 6) 美國於 1941年12月8日 向日本帝國宣戰。日本被同盟國打敗，並於 1945年9月2日 正式投降。 (5) Following the acceptance of the surrender of Japanese forces in Taiwan by the representatives of the ROC's Chiang Kai-shek (CKS), Taiwan (Formosa) remained de jure Japanese territory. The ROC government occupied Taiwan (Formosa) on behalf of the Allied Powers (led by the United States) pending a peace treaty with Japan, which would change the legal status of Taiwan (Formosa). (See page 7) 蔣介石的中華民國集團在台灣接受日本軍隊之投降以後，台灣在法律上仍屬於日本領土。中華民國政府佔領台灣是受美國領導之同盟國之委託。台灣的法律地位必須待戰後與日本的和平條約簽訂生效後才能作進一步的規範。 (6) Pursuant to the SFPT, Japan renounced its sovereignty over Taiwan (Formosa) and title to its territory. Article 2(b) of the SFPT provided, "Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores." (See page 8) 依據舊金山和平條約，日本放棄對台灣的主權與台灣的所有權。舊金山和平條約第 2 條 b 項規定：「日本放棄對台灣、澎湖之一切權利、所有權與請求權。」 (7) China never became a party to the SFPT. Neither the ROC government, which occupied the island of Taiwan (Formosa) as agent for the "principal occupying Power," nor the government of the People's Republic of China ("PRC"), which controlled mainland China, signed, ratified, or adhered to the SFPT. (See page 9) 中國並沒有簽署或參與舊金山和平條約。無論是代表「主要佔領權國」佔領台灣的中華民國政府，或控制中國大陸的中華人民共和國，均沒有簽署、批准或正式聲明遵守舊金山和平條約。 (8) Article 25 of the SFPT specifically provided that the Treaty did "not confer any rights, titles or benefits on any State which [was] not an Allied Power [as defined in Article 23(a),]" subject to certain narrow exceptions set forth in Article 21. Accordingly, China, a non-party, did not receive "any right, titles or benefits" under the SFPT except as specifically provided in Article 21. (See page 9) 舊金山和平條約第 25 條特別規定：「本條約所謂之同盟國，謂與日本進行戰爭之國家，或依據第 23 條所列舉先前為該國一部分領土的國家，而此國家已經簽署並批准本條約者。除了第 21 條的相關規範以外，本條約不授與任何權利、所有權或利益予非前述聯盟國之任何國家。」 是故，中國非作為舊金山和平條約所指之同盟國，除了第 21 條的相關規範以外，並不受該條約的任何權利、所有權或利益。 (9) Specifically, China, a non-party, was not entitled to any benefits under Article 2(b) dealing with the territory of Taiwan (Formosa). The parties to the SFPT chose not to give any "right, title [or] claim to Formosa and the Pescadores" to China. (See page 10) 特別重要的是，中國以非該條約所指之同盟國，無法獲得有關舊金山和平條約第 2 條 b 項對台灣和澎湖之任何權利、所有權或請求權。依據舊金山和平條約的同盟國所寫之條款內容，中國並未獲得台灣和澎湖之任何權利、所有權或請求權。 (10) While Article 2(b) of the SFPT did not designate a recipient of "all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores," Article 23 of the SFPT designated the United States as "the principal occupying Power" with respect to the territories covered by the SFPT, including "Formosa and the Pescadores." (See page 11) 舊金山和平條約第 2 條 b 項雖然未指定「台灣與澎湖之權利、所有權和請求權」之收受國，但該條約第 23 條為其所規範的地理範圍指定美國為「主要佔領權國」，此地理範圍也包括台灣與澎湖。 (11) Following the entry into force of the SFPT, the government of the ROC continued to occupy Taiwan (Formosa) as agent for the United States, "the principal occupying Power." (See page 11) 舊金山和平條約生效以後，中華民國政府繼續代表「主要佔領權國」的美國佔領台灣。 (12) The Treaty of Peace between the ROC and Japan, which was signed on April 28, 1952, and entered into force on August 5, 1952 (the "Treaty of Taipei"), did not transfer sovereignty over Taiwan (Formosa) from Japan to China either. (See page 11) 1952年4月28日 簽署並於 同年8月5日 生效之中日和平條約，其內容亦沒有把台灣的所有權過戶給中國。 (13) The SFPT did not terminate the agency relationship between the United States, the principal, and the ROC, the agent, with regard to the occupation and administration of Taiwan (Formosa). (See page 12) 對於美國與中華民國之間有關佔領與管理台灣之主從關係，並不是因為舊金山和平條約生效而結束。 (14) Following the entry into force of the SFPT on April 28, 1952, the ROC did not exercise sovereignty over Taiwan and did not have title to its territory. (See page 13) 自 1952年4月28日 舊金山和平條約生效以來，中華民國對台灣沒有行使主權也不擁有台灣的領土所有權。 (15) From 1945 to the present, Taiwan has been an occupied territory of the United States, "the principal occupying Power." Currently, Taiwan is an occupied territory of the United States, and Taiwan's statehood status is disputed and uncertain. Neither the SFPT nor the Treaty of Taipei nor any other subsequent legal instruments after 1952 changed the status of Taiwan. (See page 13) 1945年 至今，台灣一直是美國的佔領地，美國是「主要佔領權國」。目前，台灣是美國的佔領地，而台灣是否符合主權國家之認定標準是相當有爭議的，並未確定。無論是舊金山和平條約或中日和平條約，或其他 1952年 以後的法律文件，對台灣之法律地位並未有所改變。 (16) The United States as the principal occupying Power is still holding the sovereignty over Taiwan and title to its territory in trust for the benefit of the Taiwanese people. The occupying Power never transferred the sovereignty over Taiwan or title to its territory to any other government. (See page 14) 在目前，作為主要佔領權國的美國仍握有台灣的主權以及台灣領土的所有權。這是一個信託關係，而受益者則是台灣人民。佔領權國（美國）尚未把台灣的主權或台灣領土的所有權過戶給其他國家政府。 (17) The international community does not recognize Taiwan as a state. (See page 14) 國際社會並不認為台灣是一個主權獨立的國家。 (18) On October 25, 2004, United States Secretary of State Colin Powell confirmed the United States' continuing policy towards Taiwan. He stated, "Taiwan is not independent. It does not enjoy sovereignty as a nation, and that remains our policy, our firm policy." (See page 15) 2004年10月25日 ﹝前﹞國務卿鮑爾重申美國對台灣一貫的立場。他說：「台灣不是獨立的,也不享有一個國家的主權」。  (19) RELIEF REQUESTED: Considering that the judicial branch has the authority and obligation to preserve the Constitutional rights of persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, whether or not such persons are United States citizens, non-citizen nationals, or aliens, Plaintiffs respectfully pray that the Court enter an Order declaring that: 請求法院判決之項目： 由於司法部門有權利與責任維護在美國管轄內下人民在憲法下之權利，無論這些人民是美國公民、美國國民（非公民）或外國人，原告祈求 貴院判決如下： Plaintiffs, by virtue of living in a territory subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, 原告基於居住在美國管轄下之領土， * have fundamental rights under United States laws, including the United States Constitution. (See page 15)
【林志昇控美案】要求國務院提交文件 |